WPC^,XWT{WP}10{WP}01CourierLWP 6.0 watermark b@@@8WP 6.0 header biRETURN ENVELOPE1???CLANCY, FIRPO & WEISINGER ???ATTORNEYS AT LAW ???1801 OAKLAND BLVD., SUITE 300WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596 Courier6ALAMO ENVELOPE ???CLANCY, FIRPO & WEISINGER ???ATTORNEYS AT LAW ???1443 DANVILLE BLVDALAMO, CA 94507 CourierAWALNUT CREEK ENVELOPE  ???CLANCY, FIRPO & WEISINGER ???ATTORNEYS AT LAW ???1801 OAKLAND BLVD, SUITE 300WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596 CourierQRETURN ENVELOPE ALAMO???CLANCY, FIRPO, & WEISINGER ???ATTORNEYS AT LAW ???1443 DANVILLE BLVDALAMO, CA 94507 Courier8{WP}21iRETURN ENVELOPE1???CLANCY, FIRPO & WEISINGER ???ATTORNEYS AT LAW ???1801 OAKLAND BLVD., SUITE 300WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596 Courier0SACRAMENTO OFFICE ENVELOPE ???CLANCY, FIRPO & WEISINGER ???ATTORNEYS AT LAW ???1030 G STREETSACRAMENTO, CA 95814 CourierWALNUT CREEK LH(GALLIARD)???CLANCY, FIRPO & WEISINGER??? ???ATTORNEYS AT LAW ???1801 OAKLAND BLVD, SUITE 300PATRICK E. CLANCY1030 G STREETWALNUT CREEK, CA 94596PETER A. FIRPOSACRAMENTO, CA 95814 ??????TEL:(510) 2566884MERRITT L. WEISINGERTEL:(916) 4413605FAX:(510) 2566861FAX:(916) 4484730??? Courier<U.2<6X9`+Courier %`X/#!fHP LaserJet 5 (Copy 1),,,,0 N   oQ, d  X d X? ' xdE0,?? ' xdE&,?  , 88 1  , 88 2  , 88 3  , 88 4  , 88 5  , 88 6  , 88 7  , 88 8  , 88 9  , 10  , 11  , 12  , 13  , 14  , 15  , 16  , 17  , 18  , 19  , 20  , 21  , 22  , 23  , 24  , 25  , 26  , 27  , 286 0(($ 04F2PleadingX7XXdXXd7XG[:;   gS, d  X d X> ' xd>> ' xd>  8 1  8 2  8 3  8 4  8 5  8 6  8 7  8 8  8 9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28^ 0PF((3oQ$ !   d 8 B*&0 d dE+ B d H"#|xjQ 0C(2E$ !  u 0g8RF2RETENVWCRETURN ENVELOPE-'X `-@..  CLANCY,FIRPO&WEISINGER @..XXX-'X `-ATTORNEYSATLAW-'X `-@..1801OAKLANDBLVD.,SUITE300@..$WALNUTCREEK,CA94596XXX-<  `(-XXX-<  `(-&U'X `&U'X `&U'X `&U<  `(&U<  `( 0JlF,ALENVALAMO ENVELOPE XXX-'X `-CLANCY,FIRPO&WEISINGER -'X `-ATTORNEYSATLAW-'X `-1443DANVILLEBLVDALAMO,CA94507XXX-<  `(-XXX-<  `(-&U'X `&U+'X `&UC'X `&U[<  `(&Us<  `(( 0X|F,WCENVWALNUT CREEK ENVELOPEXXX-'X `- CLANCY,FIRPO&WEISINGER -'X `-ATTORNEYSATLAW- 'X `-1801OAKLANDBLVD,SUITE300WALNUTCREEK,CA94596XXX-!<6X`(-XXX-"<6X`(-&U'X `&U'X `&U'X `&U<6X`(&U<6X`(m 0_^F2RETENVALRETURN ENVELOPE ALAMO-$'X `-@..  CLANCY,FIRPO,&WEISINGER @..XXX-%'X `-ATTORNEYSATLAW-&'X `-@..1443DANVILLEBLVD@..XALAMO,CA94507XXX-'<  `(-XXX-(<  `(-&U |'X `&U 'X `&U 'X `&U <  `(&U <  `(e 0W lS2WC/AL-LHWC/AL LETTERHEAD WITH FOOTER*iXX+5i @< < CLANCY,FIRPO&WEISINGER   +XݭX+5,XݭXX+Xݭ@"ATTORNEYSATLAW  ,X,Xݭ-,@"PATRICKE.CLANCY  @#PETERA.FIRPO@tt MERRITTL.WEISINGER*-,,-.,,,-,@!*ALAWCORPORATION*  .XݭX,.,/Xε XX.Xݭ*iXX+5iu$K k 1)  ,iXX2i@1801OAKLANDBLVD,SUITE300WALNUTCREEK,CA94596TEL:(510)2566884FAX:(510)2566861  @4 4 1443DANVILLEBLVD,ALAMO,CA94507TEL:(510)8380900FAX:(510)8380933,&U%'X `&U%'X `&U%'X `&U&'X `&U& <  `(N&8Q 0C&:(2E$ !  &U&}'X ` 0&N\.RETENVRETURN ENVELOPE-4'X `-@..  CLANCY,FIRPO&WEISINGER @..XXX-5'X `-ATTORNEYSATLAW-6'X `-@..Y1801OAKLANDBLVD.,SUITE300@..WALNUTCREEK,CA94596XXXC7<  9`(CourierCXXXC8<  9`(CourierC&U)$'X `&U)<'X `&U)T'X `<U.)l<  9`(Courier<U.)<  9`(Courier[ 0M)p\:SAC ENVELOPESACRAMENTO OFFICE ENVELOPE XXX-:'X `-CLANCY,FIRPO&WEISINGER -;'X `-ATTORNEYSATLAW-<'X `-1030GSTREETSACRAMENTO,CA95814XXXC=<  9`(CourierCXXXC><  9`(CourierC&U,'X `&U,-'X `&U,E'X `<U.,]<  9`(Courier<U.,<  9`(Courier 0,`F,WC2LHWALNUT CREEK LH(GALLIARD) -@'X `-@.. CLANCY,FIRPO&WEISINGER-A'X `- XXX-B'X `-@..ATTORNEYSATLAW-C'X `-1801OAKLANDBLVD,SUITE300@..PATRICKE.CLANCY(#..(1030GSTREETWALNUTCREEK,CA94596@..PETERA.FIRPO(#..TSACRAMENTO,CA95814-D'X `-Ԉ-E'X `-TEL:(510)2566884@..MERRITTL.WEISINGER(#..TEL:(916)4413605FAX:(510)2566861(#..FAX:(916)4484730-F'X `-ԈXXX-G<6X`(-XXX-H<6X`(-&U1F'X `&U1^'X `&U1v'X `&U1'X `&U1'X `&U1'X `&U1'X `&U1<6X`(&U2<6X`(b 0T2jS,WC1LHLETTERHEAD WITH FOOTER ADDRESSJiXXK5i @< < CLANCY,FIRPO&WEISINGER   KXݭXK5LXݭXXKXݭ@"ATTORNEYSATLAW  LXLXݭML@"PATRICKE.CLANCY  @#PETERA.FIRPO@tt MERRITTL.WEISINGER*M,,MN,,,M,@!*ALAWCORPORATIONJ  NXݭX,N,OXioXXNXݭJiXXK5i5r 1E)  iXXQi@1801OAKLANDBLVD,SUITE300WALNUTCREEK,CA94596TEL:(510)2566884FAX:(510)2566861&U6>'X `&U6V'X `&U6n'X `&U6'X `<U.6<  9`(CourierNw@6 abEcdEefEghij&U7 'X `&27$LIBRARY.STY&37WDatJPtPtV,p\(wZ4,^* 3y9 ? H M?.OXsVmc*iRK5ML`@l %$ %x &7l &K &zd&&l' )))***0*T,b,,,- d-4/`/ /!/"0#02$2%2&2'3!((3K)3u*6 +8e8,80-8$.8@/9 X097419KT29P39`4@?@@EeAEBECEDF EF7FFa(GF<HFDIFJJEKK#LKMMKw`NKOKLPL QL]PRLSL8TLUMVMpWNEXNhYOZO[Qd\QH]Q^R-|WW"XWf{WP}10WP 6.0 watermark bWP 6.0 header bRETENVWCALENVWCENVRETENVAL{WP}21RETENV SAC ENVELOPEWC2LH{WP}01{WP}10۪HHZ$HHH$ Ы _  %  ـjSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OFTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF)Case No. CALIFORNIA,))Plaintiff,)POINTS AND AUTHORITIES ON)THE ADMISSIBILITY OFvs.)EXPLANATIONS FOR ALLEGED)ADMISSIONS ,))Date:Defendant.)Time:___________________________________)Dept:  Ы$The prosecution will introduce into evidence an alleged admission. The defense moves for permission to introduce all evidence necessary to make the alleged admission fully understood. In other words, the defendant has a right to explain what he meant and support with evidence his version as being correct.ISTATUTORY AUTHORITYÀ  Ы"Evidence Code Section 356. Entire act, declaration, conversation, or writing may be brought out to elucidate part offered. Where part of an act, declaration, conversation or writing is given in evidence by one party, the whole on the same subject may be inquired into by an adverse party; when a letter is read, the answer may be given; and when a detached act, declaration, conversation, or writing is given in evidence, any other act, declaration or writing which is necessary to make it understood may also be given in evidence."  ЫAs explained in People vs. Arias (1996) 13 Cal.4th 92, 156:  Ы The purpose of this section is to prevent the use ofselected aspects of a conversation, act, declaration, oror writing, so as to create a misleading impression on the subjects addressed. (People v. Pride , supra, 3 Cal.4th 195, 235, 10 Cal.Rptr. 2d 636, 833 P.2d 643.) Thus, if apartys oral admissions have been introduced in evidence,he may show other portions of the same interview orconversation, even if they are selfserving, which havesome bearing upon, or connection with, the admission. . .In evidence. (Citations omitted.) Also see People v. DouglasÀ(1991) 234 Cal.App.3d 273, 285.)  ЫAdmission of the rest of a statement, declaration, act, etc. is thus predicated on it being relevant or necessary for an understanding of the part already admitted. (Sprague vs.  _Equifax _ (1985) 166 Cal.App.3d 1012, 1035.) Evidence Code section 356 will allow a secondary admission to explain, modify, or qualify a primary admission even if the primary admission is not ambiguous and even if the secondary admission is of a selfserving nature. (Carson vs. Facilities Dev. Co. (1984) 36 Cal.3d 830, 848.)II(NONHEARSAY IS ADMISSIBLE TO EXPLAIN DEFENDANT'S ADMISSION$Out of court statements made to the defendant which formed the basis for his explanation of his alleged admission are admissible nonhearsay. (People vs.  _Roberson _ (1959) 167 Cal.App. 2d 429; People vs.  _Reeder _ (1978) 82 Cal.App.3d 543.) For example, in  _Roberson _, the defendant was prosecuted for making a sale of narcotics to an undercover officer. The defendant denied the offense and called his girlfriend to testify that she had told him a week before the alleged sale that she had heard that the officer in question was in fact an undercover police officer. The reviewing court found her statement to defendant admissible as nonhearsay to establish his presale belief as to the status of the buyer as a policeman from which the logical inference could be drawn that the defendant acted in accordance with that belief and did not make the sale.CONCLUSIONÀ$Since the prosecution has introduced an alleged admission by the defendant, the defendant has the right to give his explanation of the meaning of his statement and nonhearsay evidence to explain and substantiate his belief in his explanation.$Dated:   Respectfully submitted,$$$$$______________________________$$$$$$$$$$Attorney for Defendant